Solventum Corporation (SOLV) has a MarketKingdoms composite score of 60.4 (B-), an B-range rating. It ranks 1220th of 1,871 covered companies, 64th of 79 in Healthcare (sector average 64.8) and 7th of 10 in Medical Instruments & Supplies. Scores as of 2026-11-10.
Its strongest lenses are KPI momentum at 84 (Healthcare average 80) and Stock selection at 82 (Healthcare average 81). Its weakest lenses are Quality (profitability) at 23 (sector average 50) and Expansion (growth) at 24 (sector average 50).
| Lens | Type | SOLV | Healthcare average | Medical Instruments & Supplies average | Percentile in sector |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry opportunity | Research signal | 79 | 79 | 79 | 53rd |
| Stock selection | Research signal | 82 | 81 | 82 | 51st |
| KPI momentum | Research signal | 84 | 80 | 83 | 56th |
| Catalyst watch | Research signal | 80 | 77 | 77 | 78th |
| Price (valuation) | Fundamental lens | 50 | 50 | 49 | 49th |
| Expansion (growth) | Fundamental lens | 24 | 50 | 44 | 10th |
| Quality (profitability) | Fundamental lens | 23 | 50 | 45 | 9th |
| Trend (momentum) | Fundamental lens | 56 | 50 | 40 | 56th |
The most recent call analysed was held on 2026-11-05 (fiscal 2026 Q3). MarketKingdoms checks what management promised on each call against what it later delivered.
Solventum delivered Q3 FY2026 results with reported sales down 7% YoY but normalized organic growth of ~4% driven by volume. Gross margin expanded 120 bps to 57.1%; operating margin declined 70 bps to 19.9% due to ERP reversal, but normalized operating margin was ~22.3%. Management raised FY2026 guidance to the high end across organic sales (2.5-3%, ~4% ex-SKU), operating margin (22.2-22.7%), and EPS ($7.20-7.30). Separation from 3M is >90% complete with supply agreement renegotiation eliminating a 100 bps gross margin headwind from 2027. HIS separation announced with ~400 bps near-term margin dilution but proceeds to fund debt paydown and shareholder returns. Growth drivers show strong traction with significant underpenetration (V.A.C. at ~10% penetration). Transform for the Future savings at $160M of $500M target. Underlying FCF ~$1B ex-separation costs. 2028 LRP target 23-25% operating margin confidence increased.
Read from the earnings call transcript and the company's reported figures by MarketKingdoms' analysis.
Management record score: 70 (High). MarketKingdoms checks each commitment made on a call against what the company later reported.
Solventum's Q3 2026 transcript shows strong claim follow-through on separation execution, with >90% completion confirmed by both CEO and CFO. Twelve measurable claims were extracted, including separation milestones (TSA exits, manufacturing moves, DC reductions due 2027), 2028 LRP margin target of 23-25%, Clarity veneers full launch in early 2027, and full-year 2026 guidance raised toward high ends. The Transform for the Future program reported $180M spent and $160M savings against $500M targets. Q&A accountability was solid: 5 answers classified with 2 direct-with-numbers (margin expansion detail, 400 bps HIS dilution), 2 direct-without-numbers, and 2 partial (EPS dilution deferred). No later transcripts available; most claims remain not_due or still_open.
Commitments tracked: 1 achieved, 1 on track.
Analyst questions answered: 2 partial.
Specificity score: 96 (Very high): how much of the call is concrete figures, named drivers and dated plans rather than general language.
Solventum's Q3 2026 transcript demonstrates exceptionally high specificity across financial results, separation progress, portfolio actions, and guidance. Management quantified ERP reversal impacts ($125M, 630 bps), normalized growth (~4%), segment drivers, gross/operating margin bridges with bps attribution, separation milestones (90%+, plant/DC counts, TSA exits), supply agreement benefits (avoided 100 bps headwind April 2027), and raised 2026 guidance with precise ranges. Q&A was notably direct with numbers on guidance mechanics, margin trajectory, and HIS separation math. Filler phrases were minimal and mostly confined to opening/closing framing. Evidence traceability is strong with most claims combining metric, number, driver, segment, and timeline.
Q&A: 5 analyst questions, 3 answered directly with numbers. Management provided highly direct, numerically grounded answers on guidance mechanics, margin bridge into 2027, and HIS separation financial framework; only qualitative strategic questions received non-numeric but still direct responses.
Specificity factors (0–100): Low filler 82, Kpi anchoring 90, Qa directness 85, Risk specificity 78, Numerical density 85, Guidance precision 92, Operational detail 88, Timeline specificity 88, Evidence traceability 88, Named entity segment detail 92, Variance explanation quality 90.
The stock's valuation gap is -12.4%: its price is below the path its market, sector and industry moves explain (undervalued versus the model path). Factor sensitivity: market beta 0.98, sector beta -0.12, industry beta 0.83; the factor model explains 34% of its moves (R²).
| Company | Composite | Grade | Valuation gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Pharmaceutical Services Inc. (WST) | 70.5 | B+ | -25.8% |
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. (ISRG) | 67.8 | B | -6.7% |
| ResMed Inc. (RMD) | 65.4 | B | -8.8% |
| Becton Dickinson & Co. (BDX) | 64.7 | B | -8.2% |
| Baxter International Inc. (BAX) | 61.6 | B- | -23.7% |
| Alcon Inc. (ALC) | 61.1 | B- | -17.5% |
| Align Technology Inc. (ALGN) | 60.3 | B- | -11.1% |
| Medline Inc. (MDLN) | 57.5 | C+ | -2.6% |
Solventum Corporation financial statements · Healthcare sector ranking · Medical Instruments & Supplies industry ranking · All covered companies
The composite score (0–100, graded A+ to D-) blends research signals from each earnings call with fundamental lenses from SEC filings and market prices. Research signals: Industry opportunity, Stock selection, KPI momentum and Catalyst watch, read from what management said and whether it delivered. Fundamental lenses: Price (valuation), Expansion (growth), Quality (profitability) and Trend (momentum). Scores are recalculated every night and after every earnings call. The valuation gap compares the actual price path with the path the stock's market, sector and industry moves explain; it is a model comparison, not a fair-value estimate.
General information, not investment advice.